The invention relates generally to display systems, and more particularly to a display system with a distributed LED backlight. According to the patent, the display system with a distributed LED backlight includes: providing a plurality of tile LED light sources, each tile LED light source having a tile and a plurality of similar LED light sources on each tile connected for emitting light therefrom; orienting the plurality of tile LED light sources for illuminating a display from the back of the display; and integrating the plurality of tile LED light sources into a thermally and mechanically structurally integrated distributed LED tile matrix backlight light source.

Here's Apple's background on the invention: "With the advance of display systems illumination technology from incandescent to fluorescent to solid-state light sources, and with ever-increasing miniaturization, one popular electronic category seems not to have kept pace. That category is large-sized personal data displays, such as personal computer monitors.

"For many years, such monitors were based on cathode ray tube ('CRT') technology. More recently, flat panel displays have increasingly displaced CRT displays. The most common form of flat panel displays utilizes one or more fluorescent light sources located behind a liquid crystal display ('LCD') screen. Contemporary technology has enabled the use of cold cathode fluorescent light ('CCFL') light sources, but because a cathode emitter is still required, a high voltage source for striking and maintaining an electric arc through the CCFL is also required.

"With continuing improvements in light-emitting diode ('LED') technology, such as substantial improvements in brightness, energy efficiency, color range, life expectancy, durability, robustness, and continual reductions in cost, LEDs have increasingly been of interest for superseding CCFLs in larger computer displays. Indeed, LEDs have already been widely adopted as the preferred light source in smaller display devices, such as those found on portable cellular telephones, personal data assistants (PDAs), personal music devices (such as Apple Inc.'s iPod), and so forth.

"One reason for preferring LED light sources to CCFL backlight light sources is the substantially larger color gamma that can be provided by LED light sources. Typically, an LCD display that is illuminated by a CCFL backlight produces about 72-74 percent of the color gamma of a CRT-based NTSC display. (NTSC is the analog television system in use in Canada, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, the United States, and some other countries.) Current LED backlight display technology, however, has the potential of producing 104-118 percent or more of that gamma color space.

"Another reason for not preferring CCFL bulbs is that they contain environmentally unfriendly mercury, which could be advantageously eliminated if an acceptable LED backlight light source configuration could be developed for larger displays.

"When implemented in small displays such as just described, the technical requirements are readily met. As is known in the art, the illumination intensity can be rendered uniform by distributing LED light sources around the periphery of the display and utilizing light diffusing layers behind the display to equalize the display intensity. The technical challenges are modest because the screens are modest in size, so that the individual display pixels are never very far from one or more of the LED light sources. Light attenuation caused by distance from the LED light sources is therefore not great and is readily equalized by appropriate LED positioning coupled with suitable light diffusers behind the display.

"One way to envision the ease with which this challenge can be met in smaller displays is to consider the number of pixels, on average, that each LED light source must support in the display, and the maximum distances per pixel that the most distant pixels are located relative to a given LED light source. These numbers are modest (perhaps in the hundreds), so the light diminution or attenuation for the most distant pixels is similarly modest and readily compensated by suitable diffuser designs.

"On the other hand, the larger geometries of typical flat panel computer monitors and displays (e.g., larger than about 20 inches) create area-to-perimeter ratios that have proven untenable for current LED technologies, particularly with respect to LED brightness or light output. This has meant that it has proven unsatisfactory to attempt to replace CCFL light sources with LED light sources along one or more edges of such larger display screens. Accordingly, such displays continue to employ CCFL light sources even though CCFL light sources are increasingly less desirable than LED light sources.

"It would seem that a straightforward solution for replacing CCFL light sources with LEDs would then be to arrange the LEDs in some sort of array configuration behind the LCD display screen, rather than around the perimeter. Prior attempts to do so, however, have proven unsatisfactory. Commercially viable displays for general consumption must be economical to manufacture, thin, lightweight, and must provide efficient thermal management capability. Attempts to meet these criteria in acceptable form factors and costs have been unsuccessful.

"Previous efforts to achieve these objectives have failed due to a number of practical obstacles. For example, even though LED light outputs have dramatically improved in recent years, a very large number of LEDs is still required to provide sufficient brightness in such larger displays. Typically, a minimum of several hundred LEDs must be used. This then requires an enormously large maze of wires and/or bulky circuit boards to mount, support, and power such a large number of LEDs in a distributed matrix configuration. This in turn requires adequate mechanical structure to support all those components behind the LED screen. The resulting structure is bulky, thick, heavy, and not well suited for managing and removing the heat that is generated by the LEDs and the underlying electrical circuitry. It is also expensive and not well suited for efficient manufacturing.

"Another challenge with utilizing LEDs in large arrays is maintaining uniformity of color in the large numbers of LEDs. The color balance and spectra of the LEDs is limited by the phosphorescence. For example, white LEDs are often actually blue LEDs with a complementary phosphor dot on the front of the LED. Depending upon manufacturing precision (and thus, related manufacturing costs), actual colors may vary from, for example, slightly blue to slightly pink. Understandably, reducing or compensating for such variability increases cost and complexity significantly as the number of LEDs increases in larger display configurations and environments.

"The color and the output of each LED also depend fairly sensitively on temperature. The difficulties in providing proper thermal management capability can readily lead to temperature variations across the distributed array of LED light sources. Since the color qualities of LED light sources are sensitively dependent upon their operating temperatures, such non-uniformities lead to unacceptable variations in color from one portion of the display to another.

"Additionally, it would be highly desirable to provide an LED light solution for large displays that is adaptable and compliant with existing overall CCFL-based display system configurations and form factors, so that the largest number of components (e.g., LCD screens, color diffusers, filters, housings, and so forth) can continue to be utilized without the need for major redesigns and production modifications.

"As a result, prior efforts to replace CCFL light sources with LEDs in commercial consumer applications have largely failed to move beyond the prototype stage. The complexities, manufacturing costs, bulkiness, very heavy weights, color non-uniformities, thermal management challenges, and so forth, have simply combined in such a way as to leave experts in the technology convinced that they must yet await the development of even significantly brighter, more uniform, and less expensive LEDs.

"Consumers expect and demand an excellent, consistent, and affordable consumer experience. Prior attempts to utilize LEDs in large displays have thus not solved the problem of building displays that are light yet rigid, thin, easy and inexpensive to manufacture, uniform in color, low in cost, and that also provide the excellent overall high quality user experience that customers demand and expect.

"Thus, a need still remains for an improved system for a large LED backlight. In view of the ever-increasing commercial competitive pressures, along with growing consumer expectations and the diminishing opportunities for meaningful product differentiation in the marketplace, it is critical that answers be found for these problems. Additionally, the need to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and performance, and meet competitive pressures, adds an even greater urgency to the critical necessity for finding answers to these problems.

"Solutions to these problems have been long sought but prior developments have not taught or suggested any solutions and, thus, solutions to these problems have long eluded those skilled in the art."

The inventors are Michael D. Hillman, Gregory L. Tice, William Sauway, Sean Bailey, Ann Torres, Efrain Alcorta and Perry Anderson. The graphic below is a perspective view of a display system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

For more info on patents, check out Patents.com, a free patent search site.

If you like what you see at Macsimum News, if you read Macsimum regularly, if we cover your products/services, feel free to leave us a tip at the MACSIMUM TIP JAR.