TweetFollow Us on Twitter

Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. VMware Fusion

Volume Number: 25 (2009)
Issue Number: 04
Column Tag: Virtualization

Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. VMware Fusion (cont.)

How do VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop for Mac stack up?

by Neil Ticktin, Editor-in-Chief/Publisher

Start | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Application Performance Tests

In many cases, applications today, perform so well and so fast, even under virtualized environments, that anyone would be pleased for small documents and activities. We focused our efforts on larger tasks that were not only large enough to measure, but will also stress the systems to some extent.

For Microsoft Word, we took a very large document and did a global search and replace of about 95,000 items. For Microsoft Excel, we ran a macro that generated a large quantity of random numbers, and filled cells with them. And, for PowerPoint, we had the application render slides with transitions as quickly as possible (all the other PowerPoint tests worked too fast to measure).

  • Word Global Find & Replace

    • XP: Parallels Desktop 4% faster (range: 0.5 seconds slower to 6.5 seconds faster, fastest: 34 seconds)

    • Vista: Parallels Desktop 9% faster (range: 14 seconds slower to 21 seconds faster, fastest: 42 seconds)

  • Excel Macro Test

    • XP: Parallels Desktop 14% faster (range: 0.5-1.6 seconds faster, fastest: 5.5 seconds)

    • Vista: Parallels Desktop 13% faster (range: 0.3-1.3 seconds faster, fastest: 4.5 seconds)

  • PowerPoint View slide transitions

    • XP: VMware Fusion 2% faster (range: 0.2 seconds slower to 0.2 seconds faster, fastest: 5.5 seconds)

    • Vista: Both performed almost the same (range: 4.7-5.6 seconds)


    Figure 6: Windows Application Performance

    Many web pages are simple enough that they load very quickly. So, to test the speed of Internet Explorer, we created a large, complex page in HTML loaded from a local LAN server. The page was very long, but used only common HTML elements, (no JavaScript, etc.). But, for whatever reason, VMware Fusion took significantly longer ... sometimes, an order of magnitude longer--across the board. As a result, we removed this test from the overall analysis (the average of averages ... or more technically, the geomean of geomeans) so that it wouldn't skew the overall results.

    The tests performed used the same web page ... with and without SSL.

    • Internet Explorer Load complex web page

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 82% faster (range: 40-60 seconds faster, fastest: 9 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 91% faster (range: 79-126 seconds faster, fastest: 9 seconds)

    • Internet Explorer Load complex web page (SSL)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 80% faster (range: 40-60 seconds faster, fastest: 11 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 84% faster (range: 54-80 seconds faster, fastest: 10 seconds)


    Figure 7: Internet Explorer Application Performance

    Footprint Tests

    One of the most interesting things in the virtualization market is how little overhead virtualization takes today compared to what it used to. To assess this, we measured in a variety of ways. Specifically, we focused on CPU usage (overall for the Mac), real memory usage (overall for the Mac), and how long the battery would last. CPU and memory usage were measured using "top" (a command line tool that's part of UNIX with a minimum of 50 continuous samples averaged for the result).

    We ran three CPU usage tests. The first test was to boot Windows and let it sit for a few minutes to finish up its startup activities. Once done, CPU use was measured while both the Mac OS X and Windows were sitting idle. The next test studied the same thing except both Microsoft Word and Microsoft Outlook were launched and left sitting idle. The last test explored CPU usage while playing a DVD.

    (Note: For testing the playing of a DVD, we had a bit of a challenge. Parallels Desktop supports the default application for playing DVDs that comes with Windows (Windows Media Player), but we had problems with WMP under VMware Fusion. Their web site also talks about these issues. As a workaround, VMware suggests the open source VLC Player, but we had trouble getting VLC Player to work in Parallels Desktop. It was important for both virtualization environments to use the same application, so we used Media Player Classic for the tests.)

    For the two idle tests, both virtualized environments did very, very well with only 2-5% of the CPU being used. So, while one may be 1/3 or more faster, it's not a significant difference to the user in real terms.

    • CPU use for sitting idle (in %)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 1/3rd less CPU (range: 1-8% CPU use)

        Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/3rd less CPU (range: 1-9% CPU use)

    • CPU use for VM sitting idle with both Word/Outlook (in %)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 1/5th less CPU (range: 1-8% CPU use)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/7th less CPU (range: 1-10% CPU use)

    • CPU use for play DVD (in %)

      • XP: About the same (range: 3-33% CPU use)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 1/25th less CPU (range: 3-36% CPU use)


    Figure 8: Virtual Machine CPU Usage

    The memory footprint was done for two idle tests, similar to the CPU usage tests above. Here, however, the differences were more meaningful, and would be noticeable to the user. Take note, we're looking at both 1GB and 2GB virtual machines here.

    • Real Memory use for sitting idle (in MB)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 48% less RAM (range: 716-1748 MB less)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 21% less RAM (range: 274-1125 MB less)

    • Real Memory use for VM sitting idle with both Word/Outlook (in MB)

      • XP: Parallels Desktop used 39% less RAM (range: 527-1567 MB less)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop used 21% less RAM (range: 257-1109 MB less)


    Figure 9: Virtual Machine Memory Usage

    Take note, Parallels is doing something interesting here with memory allocation: Parallels Desktop only takes memory from Mac OS X when Windows needs it. In other words, if you have a 2GB virtual machine, it will initially take less than 2GB of memory from the Mac, until you've opened enough application or documents that Windows needs the RAM. By contrast, VMware Fusion appears to allocate all the memory for the virtual machine at launch.

    For the exhaust battery test, we ran an "endless loop" macro in Excel that generated random numbers. When approaching the end of battery, Parallels Desktop will pause the virtual machine, and ultimately, the Mac will go into a hibernate mode saving off where things are at. VMware Fusion will suspend the virtual machine before sleeping.

    • Exhaust Battery: Endless Macro in Excel

      • XP: Parallels Desktop battery usage lasted 8% longer (9 minutes longer for 99 min total)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop battery usage lasted 9% longer (9 minutes longer for 92 min total)


    Figure 10: Virtualized Machine Battery Performance

    File and Network IO Tests

    Originally, we ran file copy tests on all the environments. In analyzing the results, we realized that there was a huge problem. Mac OS X and Windows were interfering, in a good way for typical users, with the results. Both Mac OS X and Windows have some pretty sophisticated caching schemes, but they also made File and Network IO tests unpredictable. As just one example, sometimes a MacBook was faster than a Mac Pro, and other times it was not. In the end, we tossed out the several hundred test times, and re-tested.

    Due to time constraints, the retests focused solely on the MacBook Pro. To avoid the interaction problems with Mac OS X and Windows, we tested using data set sizes that were about the same size as the physical memory, or larger. This prevented the Mac and Windows from any type of caching. The data sets we copied from one location to another were 3.7GB total (two 1.85GB files because we needed to stay below the 2GB file limit).

    The same set of files was used for all the copies so that you can see the differences between the different methods of copying. (Most of which were in the same relative time frame, except for copying to a USB Flash Drive. See the chart.)

    Networking was done via the default NAT setup in both virtualized environments, and the defaults for disk setup for each application were used as well.

    Here were the results:

    • File copy - duplicate on local virtual hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 31% faster (75 seconds faster, fastest: 165 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 43% faster (137 seconds faster, fastest: 181 seconds)

    • File copy - to local Mac hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 11% faster (18 seconds faster, fastest: 149 seconds)

      • Vista: VMware Fusion 8% faster (14 seconds faster, fastest: 181 seconds)

    • File copy - from local Mac hard drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 36% faster (94 seconds faster, fastest: 167 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 42% faster (134 seconds faster, fastest: 182 seconds)

    • File copy - to LAN Server

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 35% faster (113 seconds faster, fastest: 213 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 16% faster (36 seconds faster, fastest: 186 seconds)

    • File copy - from LAN Server

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 28% faster (70 seconds faster, fastest: 176 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 14% faster (27 seconds faster, fastest: 168 seconds)

    • File copy - to USB Flash Drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 6% faster (53 seconds faster, fastest: 774 seconds)

      • Vista: Parallels Desktop 4% faster (37 seconds faster, fastest: 859 seconds)

    • File copy - from USB Flash Drive

      • XP: Parallels Desktop 15% faster (52 seconds faster, fastest: 300 seconds)

      • Vista: VMware Fusion 8% faster (22 seconds faster, fastest: 283 seconds)

    Or, said much better on a graph, it looks like this:


    Figure 11: Virtual Machine File and Network I/O Performance



    Start | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
  •  

    Community Search:
    MacTech Search:

    Software Updates via MacUpdate

    Latest Forum Discussions

    See All

    Six fantastic ways to spend National Vid...
    As if anyone needed an excuse to play games today, I am about to give you one: it is National Video Games Day. A day for us to play games, like we no doubt do every day. Let’s not look a gift horse in the mouth. Instead, feast your eyes on this... | Read more »
    Old School RuneScape players turn out in...
    The sheer leap in technological advancements in our lifetime has been mind-blowing. We went from Commodore 64s to VR glasses in what feels like a heartbeat, but more importantly, the internet. It can be a dark mess, but it also brought hundreds of... | Read more »
    Today's Best Mobile Game Discounts...
    Every day, we pick out a curated list of the best mobile discounts on the App Store and post them here. This list won't be comprehensive, but it every game on it is recommended. Feel free to check out the coverage we did on them in the links below... | Read more »
    Nintendo and The Pokémon Company's...
    Unless you have been living under a rock, you know that Nintendo has been locked in an epic battle with Pocketpair, creator of the obvious Pokémon rip-off Palworld. Nintendo often resorts to legal retaliation at the drop of a hat, but it seems this... | Read more »
    Apple exclusive mobile games don’t make...
    If you are a gamer on phones, no doubt you have been as distressed as I am on one huge sticking point: exclusivity. For years, Xbox and PlayStation have done battle, and before this was the Sega Genesis and the Nintendo NES. On console, it makes... | Read more »
    Regionally exclusive events make no sens...
    Last week, over on our sister site AppSpy, I babbled excitedly about the Pokémon GO Safari Days event. You can get nine Eevees with an explorer hat per day. Or, can you? Specifically, you, reader. Do you have the time or funds to possibly fly for... | Read more »
    As Jon Bellamy defends his choice to can...
    Back in March, Jagex announced the appointment of a new CEO, Jon Bellamy. Mr Bellamy then decided to almost immediately paint a huge target on his back by cancelling the Runescapes Pride event. This led to widespread condemnation about his perceived... | Read more »
    Marvel Contest of Champions adds two mor...
    When I saw the latest two Marvel Contest of Champions characters, I scoffed. Mr Knight and Silver Samurai, thought I, they are running out of good choices. Then I realised no, I was being far too cynical. This is one of the things that games do best... | Read more »
    Grass is green, and water is wet: Pokémo...
    It must be a day that ends in Y, because Pokémon Trading Card Game Pocket has kicked off its Zoroark Drop Event. Here you can get a promo version of another card, and look forward to the next Wonder Pick Event and the next Mass Outbreak that will be... | Read more »
    Enter the Gungeon review
    It took me a minute to get around to reviewing this game for a couple of very good reasons. The first is that Enter the Gungeon's style of roguelike bullet-hell action is teetering on the edge of being straight-up malicious, which made getting... | Read more »

    Price Scanner via MacPrices.net

    Take $150 off every Apple 11-inch M3 iPad Air
    Amazon is offering a $150 discount on 11-inch M3 WiFi iPad Airs right now. Shipping is free: – 11″ 128GB M3 WiFi iPad Air: $449, $150 off – 11″ 256GB M3 WiFi iPad Air: $549, $150 off – 11″ 512GB M3... Read more
    Apple iPad minis back on sale for $100 off MS...
    Amazon is offering $100 discounts (up to 20% off) on Apple’s newest 2024 WiFi iPad minis, each with free shipping. These are the lowest prices available for new minis among the Apple retailers we... Read more
    Apple’s 16-inch M4 Max MacBook Pros are on sa...
    Amazon has 16-inch M4 Max MacBook Pros (Silver and Black colors) on sale for up to $410 off Apple’s MSRP right now. Shipping is free. Be sure to select Amazon as the seller, rather than a third-party... Read more
    Red Pocket Mobile is offering a $150 rebate o...
    Red Pocket Mobile has new Apple iPhone 17’s on sale for $150 off MSRP when you switch and open up a new line of service. Red Pocket Mobile is a nationwide MVNO using all the major wireless carrier... Read more
    Switch to Verizon, and get any iPhone 16 for...
    With yesterday’s introduction of the new iPhone 17 models, Verizon responded by running “on us” promos across much of the iPhone 16 lineup: iPhone 16 and 16 Plus show as $0/mo for 36 months with bill... Read more
    Here is a summary of the new features in Appl...
    Apple’s September 2025 event introduced major updates across its most popular product lines, focusing on health, performance, and design breakthroughs. The AirPods Pro 3 now feature best-in-class... Read more
    Apple’s Smartphone Lineup Could Use A Touch o...
    COMMENTARY – Whatever happened to the old adage, “less is more”? Apple’s smartphone lineup. — which is due for its annual refresh either this month or next (possibly at an Apple Event on September 9... Read more
    Take $50 off every 11th-generation A16 WiFi i...
    Amazon has Apple’s 11th-generation A16 WiFi iPads in stock on sale for $50 off MSRP right now. Shipping is free: – 11″ 11th-generation 128GB WiFi iPads: $299 $50 off MSRP – 11″ 11th-generation 256GB... Read more
    Sunday Sale: 14-inch M4 MacBook Pros for up t...
    Don’t pay full price! Amazon has Apple’s 14-inch M4 MacBook Pros (Silver and Black colors) on sale for up to $220 off MSRP right now. Shipping is free. Be sure to select Amazon as the seller, rather... Read more
    Mac mini with M4 Pro CPU back on sale for $12...
    B&H Photo has Apple’s Mac mini with the M4 Pro CPU back on sale for $1259, $140 off MSRP. B&H offers free 1-2 day shipping to most US addresses: – Mac mini M4 Pro CPU (24GB/512GB): $1259, $... Read more

    Jobs Board

    All contents are Copyright 1984-2011 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.